by
Stephen O'Connor
You
know how you just inherently know certain things to be true.
Nobody has to tell you.
Things like the severity of the itch
is proportional to the difficulty of the reach.
The hardness
of the butter is inversely related to the softness of the bread.
Experience is something you don’t get until just after
you need it.
Bills travel through the mail at twice the speed
of checks.
We know these adages to be true.
In
the work place, there are also things that you sometimes know are
truly a bad idea but you see them happening anyway. One of them
is promoting one of your top staff performers into a management
position based solely on their history of being a top performer,
without assessing their management skills. The ability to motivate
staff, apply policies consistently, conduct strategic planning
and manage a budget are not necessarily the qualities of your top
performers.
The
temptation to promote from within is compelling. It’s easier,
faster and less costly than going out into the job market to acquire
an accomplished manager with proven skills. To make the internal
promotion decision based on the issues of cost and time is to miss
the point. Can the person demonstrate the skills necessary to be
an effective manager? Will this internal promotion into management
cause more harm than good? Does the risk of promoting an unproven
manager from within outweigh the considerations of the recruiting
costs of time and money by going to the outside? These are more
important questions than whether your top performer is entitled
to the next management vacancy by virtue of their productivity
or loyalty. Career ladders are good things but you don’t
want to loose one of your top performers to the Peter Principle
because you push them up a ladder that is missing a few skill rungs.
Shawn
Kerachsky is a principal with the consulting firm 3C Associates
Inc., and has written extensively on this subject. In the Fall
2001 issue of Employment Management magazine, Kerachsky
has isolated eight questions whose answers will denote the management-ready
candidate.
Can
they:
- act
more like a coach than a player?
- step
out of the limelight and let their employees get the glory?
- handle
paperwork and details?
- organize
themselves and their employees?
- motivate
the employees?
- spend
most of their time planning and analyzing rather than being
with people?
- listen
to complaints and resolve their employees’ problems?
- handle
personnel issues and possibly fire someone?
Further,
he recommends a three-step approach to ensure success when hiring
from within. Define the job, determine the required (management)
skills, and assess the person’s qualities as they relate
to those requirements. Kerachsky also advocates personality testing
to see if your top performer has what it takes to be a manager.
This
article originally appeared in the March/April 2003 issue of Michigan
Health & Hospitals magazine and is being used with
permission.
Back
to Top
|